-
2 additional points (I'm sure that other aspects are there, just to be uncovered):
1 - He never bothered to declare his offshore holdings in the Parliamentary Members interests register prior to becoming PM in 2010, contra to parliamentary rules
2 - He held bearer shares, an investment device his government has since abolishedbut the biggest uncovered point is: how is his father's offshore estate now being administered, and by what tax avoidant mechanism does Cameron and family benefit, because they have, they do, and they will.
Another - why did he personally intervene in EU law that would have made such things more difficult? (obviously rhetorical).
In regard to the rest of the money. Surely his mum has it. And it seems pretty likely he's due a chunk of it. But he can't/won't say that. This is more semantics - how can you claim something which you haven't been given, and if you try to push him on it, it's a bit ghoulsih.
You are reading a single comment by @ and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
2 additional points (I'm sure that other aspects are there, just to be uncovered):
1 - He never bothered to declare his offshore holdings in the Parliamentary Members interests register prior to becoming PM in 2010, contra to parliamentary rules
2 - He held bearer shares, an investment device his government has since abolished
but the biggest uncovered point is: how is his father's offshore estate now being administered, and by what tax avoidant mechanism does Cameron and family benefit, because they have, they do, and they will.