No it's not just you, The Times themselves have admitted that they have no independent evidence he treated them, just his word for it.
However, this was basically a sting operation, Bonar didn't know they were journalists, so why say you've supplied banned stuff to pros if you haven't?
On what premise was he talking to them then? Because that would matter.
Fwiw, I've no doubt UK athletes dope and there must be facilitators like this doctor advising them, but this story is so lacking in substance as to be meaningless. With Seppelt's involvement, you'd expect more.
Is it me, or is there a distinct lack of evidence, other than this quack boasting about sports people he's worked with on film?
UKAD don't come out of this well though. Naive at best, more likely negligent.