You are reading a single comment by @The_Seldom_Killer and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • He was arrested for inciting racial hatred which was based on a number of subsequent tweets which where racially charged in nature and included one where he blanket referred to muslims as "towelheads".

    From what you report, it looks like a section 5 offence, at worst.

    Aroogah nailed it.

    Nobody has any right to not be insulted by anyone, even by racists and bigots.
    Nobody was being discriminated against - insofar as discrimination is defined as being illegal or unlawful
    Nobody seems to have been abused, other than in a general sense, and general untargeted abuse is, as far as I know, not illegal, other than from a section 5 public order offence perspective, and not from a moral perspective.

    Without knowing the full context, it's probably best not to make a call though., I guess.

  • Nobody has any right to not be insulted by anyone, even by racists and bigots.

    I think this is something that I fundamentally disagree with.

    And this isn't in some namby-pamby cotton wool and coddling ideal that everyone must be lovely to each other.

    This is from the perspective that if you don't have a right not to be insulted by someone then we, as a society, consider racist, facist or otherwise bigoted abuse to be both acceptable and reasonable behaviour and should held as normal. You're welcome to believe that to be true but I don't think it is, or ever should be.

    If we do take that as a truism, that bigoted abuse of people is acceptable and normal, when does the line get drawn? When do we say that someone has gone too far? Does it have to get a bit sweary? Do taboos like the N-word have to be breached? Does someone have to be physically hit?, Do they have to bleed? Be hospitalised? Die? Or how about if a collective group of bigots are all a little bit abusive towards an individual? None of them singularly cross a severity line, is it all just a matey jolly wheeze and the victim is to blame if they, for some crazy reason, feel that the insults are compound due to their multiplicity?

  • This is from the perspective that if you don't have a right not to be insulted by someone then we, as a society, consider racist, facist or otherwise bigoted abuse to be both acceptable and reasonable behaviour and should held as normal.

    This is a false dichotomy. It's not binary, and you can't draw that conlusion from that premise.

    If we do take that as a truism, that bigoted abuse of people is acceptable and normal, when does the line get drawn?

    You're conflating abuse & insult, irrespective of the fact that it is not a truism.

About