-
From my original response to your original pm about the matter:
"My bad for not telling you - honestly thought you would be more pissed at my laziness than anything so yes I did chose to lie. Apologies as I did not realise the effect it would have on your work and waiting about. Poor form."
Not sure which part of this is me not apologising? Let me say it again - I am sorry. Also don't see how this is me not having the courtesy to reply?
Again, apologies.
croft-
That's the first time I've seen that:
"I raised my complaints with croft via PM on Sunday afternoon: he hasn't replied despite posting on the forum, so he can exercise his right to reply here."When did you send it?
Obviously after I had posted the above, at which time I would have deleted our PM: by this time it had been a week since you had last replied to a PM.
Have another look at your PM and you'll see that you were corresponding with no-one: there is no recipient.
apologies
Thank you.
Scilly.Suffolk
No, clearly it wasn't enough because it is only now that you've had the common fucking courtesy to reply to me*.
I'm sure you would rather I kept quiet (not that two tags in this thread could be considered "at every opportunity"), but the fact that it is only now that you've piped-up rather demonstrates the necessity of mentioning you again.
You're all very fired-up and strident this morning, trying to portray my behaviour as disproportionate and unreasonable and dismiss yours as "just one of those things": perhaps that's why you've forgotten to apologise?
I gave you ample opportunity to deal with this "in private", which you roundly ignored (to acknowledge that you "didn't respond the first time", but not the second, third or fourth times is deceitful).
So if you don't like people calling you a cunt, then perhaps you should...
*A whining PM bemoaning your appearance in this thread, but neither explaining nor apologising, sent after a "long lunch" doesn't count.