You are reading a single comment by @hippy and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
according to Stravistix That discrepancy doesn't seem to make sense to me
Stravistix
Stravisti
Stravist
Stravis
StraviAny Strava or plurals of Strava chat should be in the Strava thread where 'analysis' of randomly generated imaginary power values belong.
This useless reply bought to you by
DrinkBeerTrainingSystems™
hippy
Does anyone use Stravistix? I'm trying to work out the relevance of the 'Weighted w/kg' and what this means in relation to FTP. My FTP (last tested a while ago) puts me at a rubs 240W or 3.2w/kg, but according to Stravistix, my last two rides (5 hour and 2.5 hour) have been a slightly better (considering I'm not 'training') 3.5w/kg. That discrepancy doesn't seem to make sense to me as surely I shouldn't be able to average way above my FTP for 5/2.5 hours.
Today's club run was pretty fast, but according to Strava it was 105% intensity. Over 2.5 hours. This suggests to me that my FTP is too low, as I felt fine at the end of it.
I know I have to retest my FTP soon, but for future - what is that Stravistix figure actually showing me?
First picture is 5 hour ride on Thursday, second is today's 2.5 hour club run.