Anything that needs to rev to 9000+ rpm to produce power isn't going to be fuel efficient.
What was the reasoning for the Wankel? I mean what's the advantage over piston driven engine?
Efficiency wasn't an issue, was meeting unburn fuel and carbon oxides at low revs
@TRA started
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
Anything that needs to rev to 9000+ rpm to produce power isn't going to be fuel efficient.