-
But because I technically hit the rear portion of the car, they could say I was cycling without due care or something but hopefully that isn't the case.
Technically bollocks. It sounds like you're mugging yourself off.
You has right of way, they pulled across you (a more vulnerable road user) without due care.
Nothing further will come of this unless you take it further - which is you prerogative, and your prerogative alone.
I'd be tempted to file a collision report myself, make a complaint, and have, at the very least, a black mark on the fuckers' records.
-
But because I technically hit the rear portion of the car, they could say I was cycling without due care or something but hopefully that isn't the case.
Did they tell you that while explaining what the caution was about? Sounds like bullshit said just to scare you off taking it further.
Tho fair enough if you don't want to take it further yourself, that's entirely up to you.
You are reading a single comment by @Well_is_it and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
NotThamesWater
middleofnowhere
@Well_is_it
Got clarification on the caution; apparently it's just a legal way of giving a statement involving police vehicles and isn't like being given a normal caution where an offence has occured.
But because I technically hit the rear portion of the car, they could say I was cycling without due care or something but hopefully that isn't the case.