-
• #11052
Really like both of them, nice and moody.
-
• #11053
Cheers!
I'm bloody over this working/UK Winter lark.
Need to pack my bag asap and get another bunch of holiday snaps to bore people with on instagram. -
• #11054
Yeah, I used to put out a zine BITD about this, there's some interviews with folks in there too.
-
• #11055
Towards the end of last year I was experimenting with technical alternatives to the Olympus mju-ii. This is straight out of the camera, shot with a Canon Sure Shot M which only costs £2 compared to the £45–80 it’ll cost you to buy the Olympus.
SOOC, Kodak Ultramax 400.
-
• #11056
Holy cow thats good.
-
• #11057
Meter in it really isn't too bad, and the lens had the right technical specs to give the sharpness I like. Plus the mju-ii zooms get bad flare, this is a prime and way cheaper than the mju-ii prime.
That said, still not found a compact to overtake the Yashica T4.
-
• #11058
dogshot is really nice
technical alternatives to the Olympus mju-ii
Also investigating this. Just bought an Oly AF-1 Mini for £2
Looks like a cheap plastic version of mju1 - Pics to follow.Anyone tried a Yashica minitec super or J?
-
• #11059
Yashica minitec
^ I've not tried it but have wondered. The results out of the regular Minitec AF look good. A Mju 1 would probably make more sense.
It's pretty funny that Yashica T4s sell for way over their original RRP now, twenty years later. Perhaps Sony could let someone build them again (please).
I'd have a look at the Fujifilm Tiara / Supermini DL or Konica Big Mini / A4, both of which now go for less than a Mju II.
Some of the last zooms: Minolta (Riva?), late Nikon Lite Touch, Mju V etc give nice results. They have quite good lenses and exposure for flash stuff... and can be had cheap. They are just a bit horrible to use.
-
• #11060
Big mini is also on my along with nikon light touch, and canon prima mini
I've had pretty good results with mju 1 though and would definitely recommend it for scene-tax-avoidance.
-
• #11061
Does anyone want some kodachrome 25?
-
• #11062
35mm or 120? Either way I'm interested!
-
• #11063
Where would one get it processed now, since Wimbledon (Kodak) closed down years ago?
-
• #11064
35mm. 4 rolls of it.
-
• #11065
I got given it, and I'm not going to use it. It's been in a frost-free deep freeze for the past 30 years, so it should be immaculate.
-
• #11066
How much are you looking for? Ninja edit: unless someone knows of some way to have it developed I'll probably give it a miss.
-
• #11067
can cross process it, or develop t with B+W chemicals.
-
• #11069
A few photos of places at night.
3 Attachments
-
• #11070
Would anyone be interested in this lovely little Ihagee exa0? I saw it at a second hand market in Prague last week, and had to buy it because I couldn't resist the East German craftsmanship and the Zeiss glass, but realistically; I've got too many cameras, and it's just going to end up sitting on my shelf collecting dust if I keep it.
I've looked up the serial number, and as far as I can tell; it's a 1956 example of the original version of the exa0 (which is the simplified version of the exacta), which is the one too have (they made the later models (ie the exa1 onwards) more cheaply).
The lens is the Carl Zeiss 50mm f2.8 Tessar, which again, seems to be the version to have. It also comes with the original ever-ready case, which is a nice bit of debossed leather.
It's in lovely condition, without much visible wear (except the patina on the leather case) and all seems to work as it should, although it is untested. The lens is very clean, and the aperture blades move smoothly with no oil, but the focus ring does feel slightly sticky (although it does work properly).
It has the waist level finder, which is crisp and bright, and a fold-out loupe for focussing.It's yours for £50 inc postage. The cheapest one, the same as this, on eBay is £69
-
• #11071
In my opinion there hardly is such thing as "straight out of the camera" with film, as the way you / somebody else scans it already entails decisions about colour, sharpness, etc.
Nice picture though!
Just bought another roll of Ultramax myself; was pretty impressed by the first one I shot, might use this more often. It's hard to find here though! -
• #11072
Chiming in on "great compact cameras besides the overpriced Mju-II and T4", one of my favourite subjects -
Nikon L35AF and Yashica T3 all can be had for like 30 bucks in good condition, both have a top notch lens.
The Nikon is one that gives you a bit more options (backlight switch, ISO cheating, can use screw-in filters), the T3 is tougher / weather sealed, and has a (small) waist-level finder.
Both seriously recommended! -
• #11073
Yeah, I used to put out a zine BITD about this, there's some interviews with folks in there too.
cargocollective.com/colourtwelve
Awesome zine!!
Seems to be discontinued though?
-
• #11074
I'm with ya on that one Tina name changer, the T3 has pretty much the same lens as the T4 and no "Terry R" tax. Mines being going strong for years, of course it's not quite the same when you need to take a new fb profile pic with you holding the camera up to one eye in one arm against a uniformly coloured wall but ya know, we can't all be individuals...
-
• #11075
Yea I had them both and shot them alongside, couldn't say that images of one are better than the other, both are very very good.
The 3 is bulkier but I don't mind, just throw it in the bag.. with the 4 I was always worried I'll break it as it seems very fragile..
Err.. half bust Gr1, Porta 400, no tripod. Set to full auto because viewfinder is bust.