You are reading a single comment by @TTM and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • The flywheel air resistance creates really good inertia. Search TTforum or google, been discussed in detail.

    It gives a good road feel intertia. It's not quite road, but is good. So the muscle recruitment is near it would be on road.

    I love mine. Works for me. And improvements on Turbo give me improvements on road. If I keep doing some efforts on road, so my muscles stay used to variable terrain and the torque change.

  • So, are we saying that doing longish threshold efforts on one of these gives greater gains than on a fluid trainer? Watts are watts, Shirly?

  • The answer is - "it depends"

    Lower ke trainers (ie traditional ones) replicate lower ke situations (ie hill climbs)
    Higher ke trainers better replicate the requirements of lower gradients/tt'ing

    So if your goal was the quickest time up Alpe D'Huez then you might want to stick with a low ke trainer. But if you are looking to improve your performance on the flat then a higher ke trainer makes sense.

  • A watt is a watt. But the production of that watt can be different.

    And no. As danb said, it's not that simple. But I'd disagree about having a low kenetic energy trainer. That would trash my legs. As the pedal stroke would be different to on the road, recruiting different muscles.

About

Avatar for TTM @TTM started