Tester's Tandem

Posted on
Page
of 9
  • Fork looks serious! Are you restricted in airfoil shape/length choice (Rules...max 1:3)?

    Are you going to drop in shaped "not a fairing" spacers on the front tube?

  • ^ disappoint

    was expecting 4" headtube with cylinder insert bored [like figure 8] to 1.125" and 1", running skefco needle bearings top and bottom

  • Are you restricted in airfoil shape/length choice (Rules...max 1:3)?

    No, CTT rules. The shape as drawn is 3.5:1

    Are you going to drop in shaped "not a fairing" spacers on the front tube?

    It had occurred to me

  • needle bearings

    I certainly pondered messing about with the headset design, but in the end it seemed hard to beat a good old fashioned EC30 headset given that the head tube is already decided.

  • Strictly speaking, I only needed to model the head tube to check clearances, but I got carried away


    1 Attachment

    • frame.jpg
  • one big-ass spacer

    careful now

  • careful now

    Relevant xkcd.

    @mdcc_tester: That looks really nice. Do the seatstays come together before they meet the seattube? Do you have a detailed shot of that area?

  • Do the seatstays come together before they meet the seattube? Do you have a detailed shot of that area?

    The drawing is not representative of the reality, I cocked up the stays and there was no good reason to attempt to get them any better apart from CAD-training.

  • Custom parts are at least all in the CAD files, although there might be some tweaks, now I need to model the bars and stem.


    1 Attachment

    • Assembly v2.jpg
  • That's modelled? Which one are you?

    Needs moar reflecto-porn.

  • That's modelled?

    Yes, about 10 minutes rendering time on a 3.1GHz Intel i5-3340

  • Made a couple of mods, hopefully will allow the fork to work better.

    You're welcome btw.


    1 Attachment

    • tester fork copy.jpg
  • Would be much better if the frame and forks were all in the same plane, perhaps?

  • Obvs...


    1 Attachment

    • testernofork.jpg
  • Again Jorj, you're welcome ;-)

  • hehe

  • we need rep again

  • you're welcome

    No, you're welcome


    1 Attachment

    • MonoFork v1.jpg
  • Isn't this patented?

  • mirth.. :D

  • I was contemplating firing up fusion 360, but that drawing would have taken me about 6 weeks.

    You win.

  • @mdcc_tester are you running static FEA on those forks? The exaggerated bending tool is really useful
    http://youtu.be/r6dA6QjBF0k

  • are you running static FEA

    No, I'm just throwing a ton of metal at the problem. The bike already works with a standard solo fork, so as I'm not too bothered about the weight I can just supersize everything. If you know a quick way to measure the volume of a F360 model, I can tell you how much they're going to weigh.

  • You're looking for the Mass Properties thing, should be under Inspect. No clue though, I use SolidWorks myself.

  • I assume it must be something similar to properties with inventor

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Tester's Tandem

Posted by Avatar for gbj_tester @gbj_tester

Actions