I mean, they don't have planning permission, but they look like they'd have been given it had anyone bothered to ask...
I'd presume he's tried getting retrospective permission, which is an option if you've built something without permission, and been denied it. So if he had originally asked, he would have got a no.
However, I agree. Knocking them down - which will now almost certainly happen - is a massive waste of resources and environmentally dreadful. It would be much better if they could work something out but knocking down properties in this scenario is as much a deterrent to others as anything else.
I'd presume he's tried getting retrospective permission, which is an option if you've built something without permission, and been denied it. So if he had originally asked, he would have got a no.
However, I agree. Knocking them down - which will now almost certainly happen - is a massive waste of resources and environmentally dreadful. It would be much better if they could work something out but knocking down properties in this scenario is as much a deterrent to others as anything else.