PHIL WOOD Magnium/TITANIUM Bottom Bracket - ISO/Campagnolo Taper - 68 x 110.5

PHIL WOOD BB, MINT CONDITION,

Spindle Length: 110,5mm
Cartridge Width: 68-73mm
Weight: 140 grams
Spindle Material: Aerospace grade titanium
Cartridge Material Magnesium, titanium and aluminium
offset- symmetrical
eng cups
never used outdoors.

COMES WITH PHIL WOOD Bottom bracket installation tool

85GBP ( FREE POST IN UK)

1 Attachment

85GBP ( FREE POST IN UK)

Or £75 in the original thread.

no mate different bb... thats 110,5

no mate different bb... thats 110,5

"there is mistake in thread title, Spindle Length is 110,5mm not 108"

EDIT
What I should have written was "So is this one."

The weight is the same...142g....both Ti....only apparent difference is number of fitting tools...1 plays 2 but us that significant or not.

No, wait. Now I really am confused: this one's 110.5mm and so is the other one.

So you've got two 110.5mm Phil Wood bottom brackets (both c/w tools) for sale: one for £75 and one for £85?

sorry, i don't understand whats the problem?
one is with spindle length 108mm and other with 110,5mm
http://www.avt.bike/WebStore/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=BRPD0S-PTM
and
http://www.avt.bike/WebStore/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=AVT&Product_Code=BRPC8S-PTM&Category_Code=PWMAGBB-ISO-CAMP
both are like new, and both come with 2 installation tools, just 110,5 in my opinion looks newer, no scratches on shell , and also on 108 price dropped.

no weight is not the same 108 is 142 grams and 110,5 is 140 grams

do you think price is too high?

sorry, i don't understand whats the problem?
one is with spindle length 108mm and other with 110,5mm

You've now edited the post in the other thread, but it read as I have quoted above "there is mistake in thread title, Spindle Length is 110,5mm not 108".

And it remained like that for nine days and a further thirteen posts from you, until half an hour ago when you suddenly realised your mistake and edited it to read "sorry for confusion, its 108mm".

Which doesn't make any sense in the context of the thread, does it? What confusion? That's the second post in the thread: there was no confusion.

no weight is not the same 108 is 142 grams and 110,5 is 140 grams

Yes the weight you quoted was the same (142g), but you've also edited that.

I'm sure it's just a simple and entirely honest mistake, but you can understand that the situation is curious.

I think the easiest way for you to clear up the confusion, is to post a photo of both the bottom brackets together.

thanks for correcting my mistake

you right but, well 2 grams differents... not a big deal is it?

ok, photo of both the bottom brackets together

photo

1 Attachment

And apologies for doubting you!

Me too....two PW bbs....wow!

thanks

1 Attachment

110,5 prov sold...

Sold!