-
This is pretty patronising but demonstrates quite aptly what spiderpie is getting at:
http://digitalsynopsis.com/inspiration/privileged-kids-on-a-plate-pencilsword-toby-morris/
-
Only pretty patronising? Ugh. I somehow doubt there are many people who saw that comic and were like "Wow, I never realised that! My eyes have been opened!" unless perhaps they've spent their lives being ignorant oblivious
dickscloud kittens.I also doubt that @Dammit is unaware of privilege.
-
This is pretty patronising but demonstrates quite aptly what spiderpie is getting at:
digitalsynopsis.com/inspiration/privileged-kids-on-a-plate-pencilsword-toby-morris/I read this bit "The illustrations depict the story of two individuals born into different households and how their backgrounds and families play a huge role in the kind of opportunities they get in life. '
And stopped there, as its got nothing to do with what Spiderpie (seems, to me) to be talking about?
Spiderpie is asserting that there is a finite amount money available for wages in the world economy, and that for one persons wage to go up anothers has to go down - quantum entanglement for remuneration.
I think you are going to have to show your working on this one, as it sounds a lot like prejudice with no basis. As you say, happy to change that position when you provide some evidence.
Lets use, as a working example, a post-grad course lecturer.
He or she works for a University and earns £50,000/year.
I'd suggest that he or she "earns" their money by lecturing, marking, etc etc.
Whether that's deserved or not would be measurable by their performance - how many students give the course a good rating, pass their exams etc.
The realities of how the lecturer gained their position would probably number amongst them a course of study, passing exams, writing a thesis etc etc.
In your version of the world, which does sound rather a lot like a zero sum game, they've also ground the faces of the poor into the dirt and taken money (almost) directly from their pockets.
My question is how?