I didn't say we live in a zero-sum game...
No. You wrote
Well my point is that broadly for one person to succeed, there are inevitably a large number who have to fail.
Which implies a zero-sum game.
Which we don't have.
Which isn't to say that some people may get still rich, and some people may still get poor. Sometimes from the same thing.
But there is no inevitability about it.
I was implying that someone almost necessarily has to be exploited somewhere down the line for the boss to afford that third holiday home.
Which is to imply a zero-sum game.
Has this always been the case or has it only just started now?
@spiderpie started
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
No. You wrote
Which implies a zero-sum game.
Which we don't have.
Which isn't to say that some people may get still rich, and some people may still get poor. Sometimes from the same thing.
But there is no inevitability about it.