... if there were huge advantages the pro teams would have adopted it...
I'm not sure that there are massive gains to be had, rather there's no downside and there are incidental benefits: higher cadences are easier, less stress on the knees, open hip angle, and positional options.
If you find more power and are more aero, then that's a bonus.
Most of cycling would rather forswear their first born, than believe that crank length is not dependent on leg length, so it's hardly surprising there's little demand for good quality, short cranks.
Very interesting.
I'm not sure if I'm classed as a "spinner" but my TT's are usually done at around 105 rpm and that's without looking at cadence data so I'm guessing it's my natural leg speed.
I'm not sure that there are massive gains to be had, rather there's no downside and there are incidental benefits: higher cadences are easier, less stress on the knees, open hip angle, and positional options.
If you find more power and are more aero, then that's a bonus.
Most of cycling would rather forswear their first born, than believe that crank length is not dependent on leg length, so it's hardly surprising there's little demand for good quality, short cranks.