-
an rising
oh, oliver...
-
I have to find out if anyone reads this guff, don't I? :)
-
In other news (and I'm deliberately trying to not think about Paris), Corbyn has said that it would have been better to bring Mohammed Emwazi to trial, rather than kill him with a drone.
That in itself has caused some reaction, at least in the comments sections.
I have to say I totally agree. I don't believe in capital punishment for any reason. Now, in this case I'm not sure how realistic an arrest would have been, but at the very least I think it's good that Corbyn made the point. As soon as extrajudicial killing becomes the norm, we are little better than than those who would kill.
Sometimes I feel that Sanders and Corbyn are the only sensible leaders in their respective countries, who actually seem focussed on humanity, and doing what's best for the people.
-
+1 I assume it would have been near impossible to capture him without putting a lot of military lives at risk but the point that trial by a court of law would have been preferable is an excellent one.
-
I had to switch off Any Answers, I knew it was going to make me cross.
I find myself getting equally angry at both the thinly disguised islamophobia and the woolly liberal hand-wringing.
Anyone who voluntarily rings up a show like that shouldn't be allowed near a phone. -
well its probably down to the fact everyone loves paris and may even have been there particularly americans + british , but not many people have been to palestine (only one of my friends have as a journalist) . i was unfriended by a israeli for my palestinian support just last week .....sadly we are too used to war in the middle east its the norm since i was born ...
-
For whatever reason the most read story on the BBC at the moment is the attack on the Kenyan university in April.Kenya attack: 147 dead in Garissa University assault - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-32169080
-
Thought that was fake. Nope.
rive_gauche
Oliver Schick
marcom
H-Bomb
Stonehedge
Mr_Sworld
deleted
Bad_Science
Dangeruss
Fox
h2o
EB
6pt
Dammit
Sumo
gios78
aggi
dubtap
rodan-
Post a reply
About
In the news
Posted by
@Platini
France is undoubtedly being targeted because it has been carrying out airstrikes in Syria, and for it to be goaded into further military action by these terror attacks is a huge mistake. I suspect that since the Commons voted against airstrikes, the UK is relatively safe for now, but should it engage in military action again (and Cameron seems to be trying to talk tough), we are likely to see renewed terror attacks here.
The wider background is quite simple. What we have been doing for decades now is to destabilise the Near East and Middle East, largely by divide-and-rule, following the formal abandonment of colonialism, which continues to exist informally. The illusion of European (and US American) cultural and economic dominance is founded on a centuries-old slowing down of the economic development of areas like China and India, which have taken said centuries to begin catching up (and China is now engaging in de facto colonialism, especially in Africa).
The wars waged in the Near East since the colonial period and the subsequent establishment of a permanent crisis point in the conflict between Israel and its surrounding states, as well as client wars incited in the wake of the energy crises of the 1970s found their culmination (so far) in the horrible war in Iraq and the shockwaves that followed it, including civil wars in numerous countries in the region.
Apart from water and coal, Europe is relatively resource-poor but has nonetheless developed far higher land values than these other places owing to a temperate climate and geological stability, which lend themselves to investment in land (and hence economic development) more than many other places, necessitating the importing of resources and exporting of products.
All of this has caused a rising worldwide sense of injustice and an increase in guerilla activity, leading to hundreds of small conflicts, simmering or open, as well as the current horror of the war in Syria, destroying one of the world's great cultural treasure-houses (and I don't mean by that the historic buildings of Palmyra and Aleppo, but the people and their culture). As is often said (and has to be repeated), none of it has anything to do with Islam, but is simply political fightback against over-dominance and exploitation. Bombs thrown on a wedding party in Afghanistan are no more just than the retaliatory attacks. Part of standard guerilla tactics is obviously to launch unpredictable offensives in places where it is not expected to fully exploit the sense of shock and revulsion that results from them.
The West has so far seemingly done nothing effective to bring stability back to the region and help establish legitimate, stable governments. How could it after decades of dividing people there or reigniting long-simmering conflicts? The tremendous evil that George W Bush's cronies did to remove Saddam Hussein (probably because he knew too much about them) is going to remain a touchstone for world politics for a long time. Stability, of course, while it can stop civil wars and render them dormant again, is usually achieved at the expense of corrupt deals with an area's strongmen (rarely women), and can lead back to the same old divide-and-rule scenario as before. Ironically, troubled Egypt is now more stable again under a military dictatorship following a coup, although it goes without saying that human rights abuses continue.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5OkhDmeJW8