You are reading a single comment by @salad and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
..hmm, I first thought that since you're attaching the image via the forum software it maybe is downsampling the images, but when you save one of them they're 2,5 MB.
Especially on the one with the lake and trees it looks like heavy JPG compression, very blotchy.. if I were you I'd talk to them about it (if they're nice they give you .TIFFs with the same resolution, but without the compression for the same price)...Yea I know what you mean about being spoilt.
I don't currently have any lenses for my digital camera that have stabilisation, but it can handle ISO 6400 no problem while with film I hardly ever go over 400...
salad
I have two of the lenses that are meant to be good, the 50mm F1.4 and 70-210mm F4 (beercan is it's nickname).
I think I'm just so spoilt by my digital camera's low light performance and image stabilisation and I'm trying to take similar shots with 200 speed film. I should know better!
These are meant to be the high quality scans from my lab but I think they could be a bit better too.