-
• #1627
Looks like a -17 to me, given how slack the HT is. Also, in terms of stack height, check out the headset cover under the spacers. Looks like it wants to be HHSRB... but not flexible enough
-
• #1628
Funny thing about that C60 is that if they ran a FSA bar he could run it slammed with a flat stem, but because he/she is using a traditional drop it puts the hoods so much lower they're running a massive headset cover and spacers. Then again maybe the rider likes having a very small drop when climbing on the top of the bar, but still having some drop to the hoods.
-
• #1629
-
• #1630
I'm in love with this
-
• #1631
ugh...yes
same owner (he's also on here)
-
• #1632
definitely the best collection on here, if not ever...
-
• #1633
-
• #1634
-
• #1635
^ that is a threadless 17degree stem away from winning the internet
-
• #1636
-
• #1637
holy shitballs, so nice
-
• #1638
Porn IMO
-
• #1639
naaaaaaah the + stem makes it way more usable
-
• #1640
-
• #1641
repost
And saddle angle, MTB stuffs but MaxHH -
• #1642
-
• #1643
-
• #1645
lovely proportioned
-
• #1646
Sploosh!!
-
• #1647
Came here to post this!
Moar
-
• #1648
-
• #1649
^^That's just not nice
Re serotta, I feel like it needs threadless to balance the size of the shifters. Usability >>>>>>> -
• #1650
Not true. It depends on the head tube angle. It just happens that most have a head tube angle of about 73 degrees. 73 + 17 = 90 = parallel. A steep head tube at 80* degrees would need a -10 degree stem to be parallel to the ground.
*for example.