You are reading a single comment by and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Written from my phone, so apologies:

    This is a rehash of his article that was posted a page or two ago. Which is a rehash of every other piece from the last two months. There is nothing I saw which is new. With one exception - he's trying to dismiss retorts that you can't judge Corbyn based on who he may have shared a platform with. That is, he's reviving the claim that Corbyn is a horrible human because other people who like him/support him/have spoken with him are. This isn't entirely new and he admits it. But he goes one step further: Corbyn is beyond salvation because of - not who he associates with, but - who associates with him. And then goes on to tell us who this people are (antisemitic, antisecular, misogynists).

    There are a lot of problems with this argument. But they don't matter. It falls apart because it's hyperbole and moral righteousness. I agree with the principals he ended his piece on ("The causes I most care about — secularism, freedom of speech, universal human rights — are not their causes."). And these views are not inerrantly left wing (liberal, if anything, and very much shared by many Tories). The piece fails, in my opinion, because only a lunatic would assume they were not shared by others in labour. He's lost sight of reality in the clearly chaotic days post-Corbyn win.

  • his take on Corbyn and the new left here...

    Posted with no affiliation to views/politics etc etc. Lah-di-da.

    But he is a journalist I have always admired and if he has major concerns I will listen.
    I am watching all of this with interest from the sidelines, I actually voted Whig at the GE much to the bafflement of everyone who knew. Corbyn, interests me as a fellow Republican, secularist and all round principled man.

About

Avatar for   started