Doping

What she seems to be saying is:

My "off-scores" are high enough to trigger for investigation and target-testing BUT they were done after altitude training and racing so would be high because they were done after altitude training and racing. I rest my case.

Seems legit

Radcliffe believes that without this crucial context, the experts could not reach an informed conclusion on her blood values based purely on the information in the database.

Then context should be given.

Whether she is innocent or guilty this feels like she is cheery picking results she can explain away. I don't think she is saying that these are the only suspicious results.