Royalty

Posted on
Page
of 183
  • "The state. Just like you."

  • Hah, doesn't most of the UK support the Nazi at that time? (Early 1930's)

  • No, but there was strong public awareness of what fascism and socialism were, they were the political ideologies that everyone had an opinion on. People in the 1930s knew what fascism was, much more than we do today. That's why Edward Wales and Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon have no excuses for this sort of shit.

  • Aware, absolutely. There was also, among the "higher eschelons" of society, considerable sympathy. Look at the Daly Mail and Rothermere's unconditional support for Hitler. Many of the upper class were worried about socialism and communism and saw fascism as a way to avoid it. This coupled with institutional anti semitism led to some nasty people supporting filth. It was bad here but worse in France. But institutions like the police and army were there to protect fascists from reds and Jews.

    All conveniently forgotten in the war.

  • They only changed their name to 'Windsor' when war broke out.

  • i did nazi that coming.

    etc.

  • It's obvious she is parodying and therefore is no worse than Freddie Starr.

  • Nyuknyuknyuk...

  • Maybe they were actually secret Americans?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellamy_salute

  • Perhaps they just support Lazio.

  • Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

  • Ah, you scared me.

  • not that kind of boo !

  • Today is a day for everyone in the UK to celebrate the fact that we are all mugs.

    Who needs democracy when we are ruled over by such benign people like the Royal Family and the House of Lords?

    Thank God for Prince Edward.

  • i was trying to find a summary of how much we, the people, have given to the queen and her family in her x years reign
    i wonder if it is approaching a billion yet , can't be too far off surely

  • I saw an article valuing her contribution at £57 billion. Curiously, there was no breakdown of the calculation.

  • Someone on the news today said she'd ruled this country as well as we could have hoped and made it into the amazing place it is now or some such shit. Fuck em all. Cunts.

  • i wonder if corbyn got elected he might look at taking us out of the monarchy

  • it's entirely laughable how the queen's record reign, which has been brought about entirely by chance, is being called an 'achievement'. 'human being avoids dying as young as her father did' is something most of us have managed.

  • I always wonder about the money coming into our economy as a direct result of royalty-tourism. If you've ever looked at something like the changing of the guard, you'll see how popular all that pomp and ceremony is with people. Would as many people come to see it all if there wasn't a monarch? We're still a country steeped in history, with old things and beautiful things coming out of our ears. But it does rain a lot, and the traffic is terrible.
    Maybe we should make the royals do an X Factor thing, and choose one each year to be a figurehead. The rest can get a job, or go on the dole.

  • plenty of people still visit the palace of versailles...

  • It's very true, but I'm wondering if there's still a net benefit to having a royalty? i.e. do we get more tourism specifically because we've got an antiquated head of state?

  • by that logic we could make the queens waxwork in madame tussauds the head of state. (i know that's not what you really meant but... well you get the idea)

    what the fuck does a 'head of state' even do?

  • and choose one each year to be beheaded.

    I'm down with a modern take on the French method.

  • Eat the rich

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Royalty

Posted by Avatar for cliveo @cliveo

Actions