-
Cool. Yeah, I have mixed feelings about portra in general - it suits some things better than others and the colours with Fuji just seem to work better overall, especially with landscape stuff. Clues in the name I guess!
Well_is_it-
Same, I love shooting the 160 sort of like a more tame ektar. The 400 is great for portraits but can leave other scenes feeling a bit flat or dull. pro400h manages to do both well.
800 bugs me because it's still daylight balanced.
-
Fuji just seem to work better overall
To be fair I did not shoot a lot of Fuji Pro 400H, just a handfull of rolls, but definately wouldn't say it's better overall compared with Portra.
I always found it very cool. Not nice with skin tones.
I made kind of a mental note, "use this film when the weather is bad".
So yeah I guess it's pretty good for landscape-stuff in the UK ;-)
It's also even more expensive than Portra over here, so I hardly ever buy it.I just found a store that sells 36 rolls of this "Kodak Ultramax 400".
Sounds pretty shit, but pictures I've seen so far are nice, so let's see.
IR
salad
Fucking love the stuff, no examples to hand unfortunately but I actually much prefer it to porta 400 but if you're gonna pull it to 160 I feel portra 160 looks just as good in the range.