My criteria are going to be fit and comfort, the stiff rear triangle of my commuto x bike hammers the degenerating discs in my spine. On paper the reach and stack of the 56 is almost identical to my serotta. The serotta has a much more compliant rear triangle than my Lynskey commuto x.
I also want a bike with Di2 and hydraulic discs. Am not racing so comfort>stiffness. But if it's utter noodles I will not take the bike.
I guess more of the perceived flex will result from the wheels and tyres than the frame but perhaps an engineer will have a clearer understanding of this.
My criteria are going to be fit and comfort, the stiff rear triangle of my commuto x bike hammers the degenerating discs in my spine. On paper the reach and stack of the 56 is almost identical to my serotta. The serotta has a much more compliant rear triangle than my Lynskey commuto x.
I also want a bike with Di2 and hydraulic discs. Am not racing so comfort>stiffness. But if it's utter noodles I will not take the bike.
I guess more of the perceived flex will result from the wheels and tyres than the frame but perhaps an engineer will have a clearer understanding of this.