But his isn't science. It's journalism, and there is no fucking story.
Sooner or later clean riders are going to get close to EPO fueled climbers. Does this support the notion that riders are doping? Not on it's own. That's not to say some marginal gains don't bend the rules/TUEs.
[The Science in Sport podcast has some comment on Froome's performance.](http://sportsscientists.com/2015/07/close-your-eyes-really-tightly/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20blogspot%2FcJKs%20(The%20Science%20of%20Sport)
But his isn't science. It's journalism, and there is no fucking story.
Sooner or later clean riders are going to get close to EPO fueled climbers. Does this support the notion that riders are doping? Not on it's own. That's not to say some marginal gains don't bend the rules/TUEs.