-
What I’m trying to say is that I don’t see a problem with motorists being delayed even a couple of changes of lights because they’re surrounded by cyclists. In reality I can’t see this happening on more than one occasion as the motorist will just bully their way through the cyclists once they’ve been delayed for one change of the lights. It’s only an issue in a couple of cycling hot spots like London where cyclist are becoming a collective force of numbers on the roads.
Regardless, you shouldn't be repeatedly firing your horn at people because you think their stopping you moving off from a set of lights.
HousecatHST-
Yep this is true. If you took those twenty cyclist and put them in cars, ahead of the car in question then they would have to wait a few light changes as the snake of cars inches forward.
"Oh but, the bikes keep getting to the front of the queue". Yes they do. And on fast A-roads the cars keep overtaking the bikes.
Appropriate vehicle for the environment = winning.
-
Still don't follow. It's okay that traffic control indefinitely delay one type of road user because that road user will eventually "bully their way through"?
mashton
GF
What? That makes no sense.