• You have to look at the specific geo to make an informed decision or face an expensive mistake. The 2 most important measures are effective top tube and reach.

    Not knowing knowing if you are a gibbon or leggy doesn't help but the effective top tube on the 21.5 is mahoosive and very unlikely to fit you with a normal 70mm - 80mm stem. I ride a 627mm ETT with an 80mm stem at 6' (and that's probably a bit longer than normal) so you are unlikely to want to go above the 19.5" which has an ETT of 639 and will probably allow you to run a normal stem and bars.

    Reach looks long too at 443 for the the 19.5" so the 21.5 must be designed for giants

    ps looks a nice bike

  • Thanks to you both @BareNecessities @AdsH, I've never had a proper bike fit so I'm very shaky with measurements as all my bikes are varying sizes. I'm most comfortable on my 57 (550 effective) CX bike with a 100mm stem, which I think is better suited to my longer legs and shorter torso.

    I suppose I could always use the stem to stretch out on a smaller frame, if I found it too cramped. Does the more upright position mean being cramped up is less of an issue?

  • In truth I don't know. My position is a function of what gives me reasonable power, weight over the front wheel, the ability to move around and has a modicum of attack/aero. It's quite long but not very low because my neck has to last 12hrs. I think I run the bars 3" lower than saddle.

About

Avatar for who22 @who22 started