-
• #93626
-
• #93627
-
• #93628
-
• #93629
-
• #93630
What just happened?!
-
• #93631
Thanks
-
• #93632
die wil ik wel eens lezen.
You see, you guys aren't the only ones speakinng Dutch.
-
• #93634
Goh, saarf, my question was just rhetorical, I'm not really interested in a "private" dispute.
-
• #93635
sorry ;0)
lovely morning now, porridge in a bit then some hills on the dream
-
• #93636
I logged in this morning and thought I'd missed 3 pages of bike porn.
I was sadly mistaken.
Stick to a pm... -
• #93637
Hills are for this evening; but on a Master Extra Light, not a Dream. ;-)
-
• #93638
reposting for two reasons
- sublime and b) 3 pages of dick waving
- sublime and b) 3 pages of dick waving
-
• #93639
;0)
-
• #93640
Nineties Flite on a bike with mid-eighties parts = [porn factor]/2
-
• #93642
so, still more porny than two donkey having an internet fight then?
it's a win
-
• #93643
Nineties Flite on a bike with mid-eighties parts
Would you complain about 90s bar tape on an 80s bike too? If you actually ride your bike, contact points wear out!
-
• #93645
I saw here some bikes that weren't accepted as porn because they had the bartape attached in the wrong direction. So I think an era-incorrect saddle is at least as valid as a reason to (partially) reject.
But as campervangogh says: it's more porny than an internet fight. And ofcourse: it' s a nice bike.
-
• #93646
BigH thank's for my old Bazou ; )
-
• #93647
I saw here some bikes that weren't accepted as porn because they had the bartape attached in the wrong direction.
Bad example. That's not fussy, it's basic.
Tape wrap direction depends on grip. Get it wrong and it loosens.
-
• #93648
I have to admit, the Flite does not do it aesthetically for me on that bike.
-
• #93649