Bike porn

I want it!
where did you find that?

If your custom-built frame requires that seat-post you're doing something wrong.

Or you love thomson in-line posts loads and factor that in....which I don't but other than that it's clean and a nice looker!

That or you've just got long femurs...

did they factor in the seatpost to get a more compact/stiff frame? or shorter wheelbase maybe?

Not sure where the problem is other than the Thomson setback looking naff when it's pushed into the frame right up to the bend.
It only has 16mm of setback where as most setback posts have 25mm.
So it seems normal to me to get a custom frame using a setback post...
Wouldn't it make the seat tube angle slack to compensate if they had built it around an inline?

If anything I'd say the frame was too big for them and should be smaller but then they would need even more of a stack on that already huge stack of spacers... So it's probably a compromise between standover and stack height...

Someone post a bike.

Probbers a reep but oh well.

repost

https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8578/16158791632_3afe1eca62_o.jpg

amey wins the page

So it seems normal to me to get a custom frame using a setback post...

It is, very normal, apart from the Thomson whose setback doesn't really offer anything.

So it seems normal to me to get a custom frame using a setback post...

It is, very normal, apart from the Thomson whose setback doesn't really offer anything.

Agreed on that point.

Seatpost height seems fine, is the spacerstack that bugs me

Yep https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14LcvpXmb74

^Nice tyres and campy rims !!!

you'd have more info on these?

@TRA

I think the first post on this thread should be edited to include this

1 Attachment

I think this is cool as f***!

http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=325290

That Colt is anti.