Digital photography

Posted on
Page
of 857
  • I'm guessing yes even for the poo.

    If the definition of the images is enough good to allow you to spot any remnants of junk food in it I don't see why not.
    You can see it as the container or wrapper.

  • ..may be good news for the Fuji X-mount people: Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 R WR

  • cracking sky!

  • instax mini

    ..love instant film. It's just really expensive..

    Clayton Cubitt made nice prints (shot on other equipment, edited, then exposed on instax mini material)..
    check here if you're not familiar with it: http://claytoncubitt.com/shop/miniprints

  • Pretty cool.

  • I've had this happen before, pretty much made no progress ringing the publication (not ryanair in my case) as they wouldn't let me through to anyone as I wasn't already a contractor with them!

    Just send them an invoice in with a covering letter in a non arsey way, for mine going rate was around the £150-200 mark (big paper, medium story, front of section) I invoiced for £450 (not vat registered so dont bother with that) and about 8 weeks later a cheque turned up with no apology or anything. They do it on a daily basis, only occasionally do the owners find them out.

  • Erm , well that was a while ago. I called the magazine, got put through to the picture editor who was surprised and apologetic about it all and they paid up in a month. They couldn't have been nicer about it really so I guess from time to time it goes better than you might expect.

  • probably the forum "going to last read post" in action again

  • Man from another time! by Michael M Rennie, on Flickr

    Seasick by Michael M Rennie, on Flickr

    Moon shine and star light by Michael M Rennie, on Flickr

    A couple of recent outings with the camera and one for and inspired by @tina.kino :)

    Open door by Michael M Rennie, on Flickr

  • ^ Good stuff. I like the garage door...


    1 Attachment

    • Screen Shot 2015-04-24 at 13.44.51.png
  • x100t...oxford st...


    1 Attachment

    • blue blue-2.jpg
  • blip

  • another...


    1 Attachment

    • blue blue.jpg
  • one more


    1 Attachment

    • blue blue-3.jpg
  • and


    1 Attachment

    • blue blue-4.jpg
  • nice work everybody!

  • Some great shots ^ love the cranes, I shot a few frames on the 35mm camera last week of some construction site stuff, waiting for it back from the lab.

  • The force is strong in this page.

  • I like springtime :)

  • That's lovely, as is the house at night one.

  • They're beautiful! Tried and failed to capture similar stuff when I was last lurking around in the woods.

    Was in the London a couple of weeks ago, with a few hours to kill before the train home. Decided to go to Look Mum to watch Paris Roubaix, and visit the Barbican on the way...

    More. Found it reaallly difficult to get satisfying shots :/

  • Nah, you did good. Its probably the most photographed place in London, apart from touristy places so it's hard finding something unique.

    I just like all the parralaxes one notices when walking around there, things line up like those channel 4 sequences.

  • Tried Nikon's 35mm f/1.8G today.
    Does look and feel pretty cheap, considering it's £450.
    All their recent lenses are plastic, still I like the proportions of the 50 and 85mm f/1.8G a lot more both regarding feel and look.
    Have to say images look really good though, and it seems to focus a tad faster than the 50 and 85 f/1.8G.
    Still not sure whether to go for this new lens, or just get a used 35mm f/2 AF... (anybody on here own / use both?)

    Or wait and see if Nikon finally manages to do a nice semi-wideangle pancake?

  • I know at least 3 sets of similar old ladies that cruise putney....very midwich cuckoos..

    x100t again


    1 Attachment

    • blue blue-5.jpg
  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Digital photography

Posted by Avatar for deleted @deleted

Actions