-
• #9077
-
• #9078
^ doing it right
-
• #9079
so can a cross bike with DT shifters.
-
• #9080
Awesome. anymore pictures?
-
• #9081
The forks on those Shands look awfully narrow for disc brakes, non? Or does that not matter?
-
• #9082
Narrow clearance or thin in profile?
Thin isn't an issue if they are strong and stiff enough where needed. They're steel.
-
• #9083
Thin profile. Perhaps it's the straight blades tricking me into thinking they're weaker than they are. (Not that straight blades are weak, just some stupid association I obviously have in my head.)
-
• #9084
-
• #9085
Rocking horse poop brakes
-
• #9086
Omnium Minimax rocksolid fast as hell everyday cargobike
-
• #9087
All city bike nature boy disc
1 Attachment
-
• #9088
Similar clips are on ebay for a couple of quid: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/VINTAGE-RALEIGH-BICYCLE-REAR-MUDGUARD-FENDER-MOUNTING-CLIP-NOS-/121604524770?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_3&hash=item1c5031cae2 I have one of these and it slots onto some alloy mudguards no problem.
-
• #9089
more here: http://www.fern-fahrraeder.de/#ueber-uns
-
• #9090
-
• #9091
http://www.bristolbicycles.co.uk/content/index.php#.VRPbgnNwav0
New utilitarian bike brand in Bristol, very un-flashy, verging on anti / pub bike territory but put together with a focus on ease of maintenance and low cost whilst not being total shit.
-
• #9092
Why pay that much when you can get a fully equipped Ridgeback Speed for less? (£330).
Especially when it come with mudguard and rack;
-
• #9093
( that's not less) for small riders the 26" wheel size would be good.
-
• #9094
The 15" model is actually pretty small, especially the step thru model.
-
• #9095
Wheel size, not frame size. Looks decent for non-little people though.
-
• #9096
-
• #9097
Awesome!!
-
• #9098
looks fantastic!
-
• #9100
..but a little rear heavy, non?
Shand goodness
XTR Di2 townie??