Photo Of The Day

Posted on
Page
of 308
  • ..this is well done and all, still it puzzles me why somebody would spend so much time doing this.

  • Do me a favour and don't use the 'in reply' function, it just clogs up my 'following' page. Thanks.

  • a'ight

  • What's missing is a function to disable that.

  • If you want think that now I'm trying to do things in a certain magnitude just because the previousness of posts was talking about miniature then you are just wrong.

  • The Old Stockholm telephone tower around 1890, with around 5000 phone lines connected to it

    I found it via the frankly fascinating Official flickr account of the Swedish National Museum of Science and Technology:
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/tekniskamuseet/

    If you want to read a bit more about the tower you can here:
    http://www.ericsson.com/thinkingahead/the-networked-society-blog/2014/10/06/telephone-lines-darkened-sun-stockholm/

  • Making the most of the usual photo-opportunity.

    Suzanne Plunkett/Reuters


    1 Attachment

    • 1000.jpg
  • Is that some sort of Beatles reference?

  • Yep, Mark E. Smith on the right.

  • Life in the High Atlas

    Youssef Boudlal/Reuters

  • have they not heard of the TOXINS that are in ALUMINUM kettles? And on a child smdh. Are they too close to the CHEM TRAILS? Wake up sheeple. OBAMACARE. GLUTEN. GMO.

  • Tim Hetherington and Chris Hondros Memorial

    April 20th marks the fourth anniversary of the mortar attack that killed photojournalists Tim Hetherington and Chris Hondros in Misrata, Libya. For the occasion, the Frontline Club in London is celebrating their lives by showing new work created by friends, colleagues and others who carry on Tim and Chris’s legacy of telling important stories with powerful photography.

    Frontline Club
    13 Norfolk Place, London W2 1QJ
    Monday, April 20th, 7pm

    Read more about the event and reserve your ticket via the Tim Hetherington Trust website.

    (via http://reportagebygettyimages.tumblr.com)

  • Not a good photo, but and unexpected coming together of two of my interests.

  • 17 Melted and damaged mannequins after a fire at Madam Tussaud’s Wax Museum in London, 1925.

    “A cheer came from the assembled thousands when the salvage men came out carrying a large cage in which was the renowned Mme. Tussaud’s parrot. The parrot was found lying at the bottom of its cage stupefied as a result of the smoke and the intense heat, but after a few moments in the open air it revived…Then it startled everyone by remarking, ‘This is a rotten business.’“

  • I was such a space nerd as a kid. Pictures like this still make my heart flutter.

    CRS-4 by Official SpaceX Photos, on Flickr

  • A little repetitive eventually, but some interesting shots.
    http://www.boredpanda.com/wave-photography-ray-collins/

  • ..very nice, thanks for sharing!

  • So we're agreed then.

  • lolz - just in case it wasn't repetitive enough first time round.

    i even knew i'd seen half these before when i posted this...sorry, it didn't click.

  • Cheers, they're still astounding, especially when considering where one would have to be to get those shots.

  • An Open Letter to Garbage

    Dear Shirley, Butch, Duke and Steve

    I don’t know if you will remember me, my name’s Pat Pope and across a few years in the Nineties I worked for you as a photographer. That’s one of my photos of you accompanying this letter. I worked pretty hard on that photo - actually, throughout my time as a photographer I hope I’ve always worked hard to make all the artists I’ve had the opportunity to shoot look as good as they can.

    Today I received an email from your management company Big Picture Music Co. It’s a very nice email, and in it they announce that you’re working on a book about the band which you plan to self-release next year. The email says that you really like some of the photos I took of you and would like to use them in your book. It also says that in return for the use of my photos you will give me a “proper credit” but that given it is planned to be a self release the budget is “financially limited”, by which your management company mean “we’re not going to pay you”. So I wanted to ask you a couple of questions, and I wanted to do it publicly because I think it’s important that people know what your answer is. I don’t expect as many people will see this Open Letter as Shirley’s recent message to Kanye West, but I think it’s important we know where you, as artists, stand.

    Q1: I’m a firm believer that musicians and artists deserve to be paid for their work. I’ll sign any petition that’s out there supporting that concept, and even when I choose to stream rather than buy, I’m one of the fans of your band that will pay for a premium service because I think you should be paid. That’s my point of view. Is it yours? When you think about artists being paid, does that include photographers? Do you think “content providers”, whatever the hell that means, deserve to be paid for their work, or is that a special category for musicians? If I want to release a music album, can I use your music in it if I give you a “proper credit”?

    Q2: If you’re putting together a book, presumably someone at your management company or somebody in the band has written a budget. And if there’s a budget, somewhere in that budget, against the line for “use of photos” somebody has written “no need to pay, we’ll just give them a proper credit and get them for free”. Against all the other lines, for writing, for printing, for distribution, for retailing, for marketing, for the management company, for the band, for Uncle Tom Cobbley and all, somebody, somewhere, working for you, has written a number down because that’s what it costs. But that same person has written zero for photos, because that content, in their opinion, they can get for free. Who is that person? As a band are you happy to be employing someone who thinks like that? Because it seems to me that the person who writes down “zero for photos” today is the same person who will write down “zero for music” tomorrow because they don’t respect the “content providers”.

    By writing this open letter, I’m obviously committing professional suicide when it comes to ever working with you again, and probably it won’t do my reputation any good within the music industry to be seen as troublemaker. Obviously that worries me, but it worries me more that musicians and others are saying one thing publicly about the needs for artists to be paid for their work whilst privately people working for them are doing exactly the opposite. I’m not accusing you personally of being hypocrites, I don’t know how involved you are in this process, but I’m letting you know it’s happening and it’s happening in your name.

    So, very respectfully, …….no.

    No, you don’t have my permission to use my work for free. I’m proud of my work and I think it has a value. If you don’t think it has any value, don’t use it. I’m saying no to a budget that says you can take my work for free and make money out of it.

    Thanks, and still a fan of the band

    Pat Pope
    http://www.patpope.com

    PS: Just so you know, this is actually an improvement on the management of your Absolute Garbage album where the record company just used my work without even asking. I only found this out when I went into a shop and bought a copy, which, when you think about it, has a certain irony.

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Photo Of The Day

Posted by Avatar for Crispin_Glover @Crispin_Glover

Actions