-
• #402
Obviously never build a bike yourself.. it's fine as is, rear derailleur cable is fine for Campagnolo, Sram maybe would've needed more..
Only thing is the spacer yeah.
-
• #403
I guess this thread follows on from HHSB as an alternative to Pron in which a light hearted approach is taken to critique. The cockpit transition on the Landshark is fine, If horizontal the hoods might be over rotated. the cabling is also minor imo. The frame alone cancels out all negatives really.
-
• #404
Nothing wrong with tops that point down.
-
• #405
Hear Hear!
-
• #406
I dunno, it could be improved, maybe a neg stem but it's still rad. Thread more about sharing radness than picking holes? Not having a go liek!? Just Pron gets fucking tiresome. B-)
-
• #407
Hefty
^ Would. Obvs once the spacers, bar angle and cable lengths are sorted.
Cables look fine, and the bars point toward the rear brake bridge. Not all bars are designed to flat 'tops' and not everyone wants them
-
• #408
Yeh. Ok. Cables look better in those pics.
I stand by the bars thing tho. Flat tops is moar slave. As would be a -ve stem.
-
• #409
Enve/edge don't make anything more than 6ยบ
-
• #410
Well that's my business lost then.
-
• #411
-
• #412
-
• #413
-
• #414
-
• #415
Sick faaaaaaaaaaaadezz
-
• #416
-
• #417
-
• #418
Dem dropouts!
Regarding the Saffron above.. I appreciate the work that's clearly gone into it, but I think the whole package is pretty woeful IMO
-
• #419
.
Landshark is rad -
• #421
I've been looking at that frame for weeks. Can't justify it though and I like my 'dale too much to replace it.
-
• #422
Then u see the frame price and laugh it off.
-
• #423
Is that heading down into the Limehouse Link pre TDF?
-
• #424
Have we had this (in any of the threads) yet?
-
• #425
Fucking hell that is a punishable offence ^
Is. Tops point down.
Isn't.
Doesn't. Rear derailleur needs more loop, front brake too tight, rear brake too tight at the back. Needs moar cable.
Come on man, this is HHSRB, stop being so reasonable.