• Maybe there's a differentiation in examination based on the presence of a helmet.

    If there is, then all hope is lost, since even people who are supposed to be scientists have been fooled by the propaganda. Unless there's brain science I don't know about which points to very different treatment protocols based on the small statistical differences between helmet and no-helmet, i.e. helmet users tend to suffer slightly smaller linear accelerations, but no-helmet users tend to suffer smaller angular accelerations.

  • Is current medical practice that evidence-based yet?

    Notwithstanding that it is filtered through the practitioner themselves.

    But maybe it's just a data point that they are capturing.

About