-
• #377
As you wish.
More: http://www.abovecategorycycling.com/botw-lunners-pegoretti-marcelo/
Steel frame, traditional geo, deep carbon, and ridden to fuck
-
• #378
-
• #379
Quite surprised nobody posted this yet:
-
• #380
-
• #382
maybe because it's actually very boring and run of the mill?
-
• #383
Anybody know what bars on that LOW? Zipp SLC2 or something from Ritchey?
-
• #384
I like the paint
-
• #385
The frame is boring, the rest (including paint) is pretty much a slave fest, especially if paired with a meaningless alu frame
-
• #386
Ritchey WCS Logic
-
• #387
That's lovely. What cranks are those?
-
• #388
Enve enve enve is just the norm now
-
• #389
Thanks. Those are FSA krono cranks. Forged crank on a carbon spider but not the lightest bit of kit.
They also did a track version iirc
-
• #390
For me take away the Enve wheels and put a shallower carbon tub with black tubs and I'd be all over that low
-
• #391
The Low is trying way too hard. & as Breso said, it's porn-by-numbers (for modern roadies at least)
-
• #392
I much prefer the similar looking S-Works Allez
-
• #393
Ideally, how big should the rear loop be on the SRAM Red / Force mechs? Is there some sort of rule for it?
36 cms if the cable stop is under the chainstay is what an sram tech video said when I installed mine. Can't seem to find the video now, sorry. I managed to get a nice transition with a slightly shorter outer loop in the end but it's going to look like a balloon no matter what so just accept it :)
-
• #394
Friend's C40
1 Attachment
-
• #395
reposted to a new page as this is clearly the winner of the thread
-
• #396
Not with that chainring. Na ah. B-)
-
• #397
-
• #398
^ Would. Obvs once the spacers, bar angle and cable lengths are sorted.
-
• #399
Goes without saying
-
• #400
Nothing wrong with the bar angle on that. Hard to judge cable length from a side shot, looks alright though.
Spacers have to go yeh.
Surely post a biek then mate