You are reading a single comment by @aggi and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • The wording seems fairly strong here:

    Guidance will be provided on the reverse of the freight stickers about
    (a) which vehicles they should be put on and (b) the approximate
    location it should be placed.

    Guidance as to which vehicles the freight stickers are suitable for is
    included on the FORS website at point of ordering the stickers.

    We are drafting the website content now and will update this once the
    final sticker design is known. Draft text will be shared with you(*)

    The members of the CLOCS working groups (which include the FTA and
    RHA) have agreed to support the new freight sticker.

    The new freight sticker will be sent out to all FORS members with
    instructions to remove their old sticker and replace with this one.

    A statement was sent out to all taxi and private hire trade
    associations on 19 June to inform them that these stickers should not
    be used on their vehicles.

    At the end of June we advised all our taxi and private hire inspection
    staff that the cyclist stay back stickers are not approved (so they
    will be told to remove these if found).

    We will send email updates to taxi and private hire trades to remind
    them of the correct cycle safety stickers that should be displayed
    (e.g. the ‘dooring’ stickers).

    We are pursuing legal action against the individual selling the
    current freight stickers on eBay.

    The Buses team will replace all stickers on buses on a rolling basis
    until they are all updated.

    The last line in particular, which clearly isn't the case in reality.

    I was wondering whether the hold-up was in agreeing new wording or if it's just stalled somewhere.

About

Avatar for aggi @aggi started