-
I recall there was a long discussion on another topic about this, in fact I think it's an entire topic about this, @Oliver Schick probably know what I'm rambling on about.
On another note, do anyone know which Belgian style winter cap that have a massive flap to cover your ear?
At the moment I got the LMNH one and it just about cover my ear, Rapha's own barely, the bearing aids take up quite a considerable amount of room.
edscoble-
On another note, do anyone know which Belgian style winter cap that have a massive flap to cover your ear?
At the moment I got the LMNH one and it just about cover my ear, Rapha's own barely, the bearing aids take up quite a considerable amount of room.
Quite like this Prendas one.
http://www.prendas.co.uk/catalogsearch/result/?q=Prendas+Ciclismo+Belgian-style+Winter+Hat+
Trust you to ask for massive flaps - tsh! -
On another note, do anyone know which Belgian style winter cap that have a massive flap to cover your ear?
Maybe not as stylish as the traditional options, but I use one of these and rate it highly. It suffers from wind noise a bit, but I think most variations on the theme suffer the same problem.
Miss_Mouse
GF
Why do we (people in general but especially the press) describe collisions as "cyclist vs car/lorry/bus/van/truck"? Why apportion humanity to one and not the other? Every time I read it it sounds like it is the vehicle itself that is responsible/affected rather than the sentient being behind the wheel. Why not say "a bicycle and a car collided" or "a cyclist and the driver of a car collided" and then describe how either party is affected. The former being more accurate as the latter could have happened while they were both out walking somewhere.
Genuine question.