-
if the cyclist is moving straight on in the bus lane and the car is only indicating to turn left across the lane then the cyclist has the priority.
Indeed but, as I'm sure you know, undertaking (or whatever you want to call it) a left indicating vehicle comes with a risk. The moral high ground ("I had priority") is useless when you're crushed under its wheels.
Greenbank-
In that particular circumstance I get really fucked off. Buses will happily trundle along a bus lane at 20-30 mph with impunity, even when traffic in the regular lane is at a standstill or much lower speed. As a driver who is in the regular lane, you wouldn't just turn left in front of an approaching bus barreling along at a fair lick, so why does it become perfectly normal to do that to 1, 2, 3, 4, or however many cyclists. Same as people waiting in side roads who get let out by someone in the normal lane, that doesn't allow you free access over the bus lane, you wouldn't pull out in front of a bus so why pull out in front of a cycle?
CUNTS. The lot of them.
NurseHolliday
if the cyclist is moving straight on in the bus lane and the car is only indicating to turn left across the lane then the cyclist has the priority.