-
• #36652
ftfy
-
• #36653
Needs Overflying Top Attack.
-
• #36655
-
• #36656
Falco looks alright with someone on it in that colour scheme. Don't look up the red version.
-
• #36657
I don't think the red is as bad as the Tron version. Even in stealth mode, it's still an ugly beast
-
• #36658
Theres a red one on the bay, fugly looking beast
-
• #36659
-
• #36660
Yeah same frame on the bay, any ideas on weight?
Andy
-
• #36661
any ideas on weight?
If you're asking about the weight of a TT frame, you're doing it wrong.
-
• #36662
Yeah I understand weight vs aero,s, it just looks like a lump of carbon.
Andy
-
• #36663
2250g frame and fork according the maker, although given the alarming level of marketing bullshit on that page I'd take any claims with a healthy pinch of salt. If true, and if that 2250 includes the seatpost, it's about half a pound heavier than my T3. If I could gain 25W of drag reduction in exchange for only half a pound, I'd take it.
-
• #36664
Just read the page the weight/aero claims, that amount of marketing hype would make me a bit suspicious. Is there any other testing to prove the claims?
Andy
-
• #36666
From the land of hip hop. -
• #36667
-
• #36668
Orders custom frame... Orders it too big.
-
• #36669
Low would look ok to me with bullhorns...like this the angles don't fit the drops (for me at least).
-
• #36670
when is too big too big tho? im riding a 58cm atm and think id be ok with 60-61. the less spacers the better. how low can one seatpost go* before its anti. i remember reading some thing years ago about setting up seatpost belgian style. i dont think im making that up. iono. i stood over a 61 and my nuts don't slap. that low is terrible btw
-
• #36672
these type frame are made to have more saddle to bar drop.
-
• #36673
-
• #36674
Straight outta Halfords?
-
• #36675
.
1 Attachment
Overflying-Top Attack!