Doping

You are reading a single comment by @deleted and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.

•

Ethel

I think it's a good answer. It's mostly likely true that other sports cover drugs or bad behaviours up (to an extent) but in cycling, because it's such a drama, it's lapped up and people get dead excited over it.
'HA, you've been doping omg, can you actually even cycle?'
hmm, performance enhancement drugs of most kinds are undoubtedly bad for you, and only serve to push up expectations of the sport so I don't know why they bother. Oh. Money.

•

deleted in reply to @Ethel

It's a terrible answer.

Have there been any clean Grand Tour winners from the last 25 years, and if so, care to name them?

•

andyp in reply to @deleted

Yes, plenty. LeMond, Evans, Wiggins, Froome, Nibali, even Basso. You could make a case for Sastre too.

There have been plenty of doped riders winning them too, but that was the era the sport was in. If you think the sport remains in that era then I think you'll fit right in over at The Clinic.

About

@deleted started