You are reading a single comment by @Chak and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • I don't really follow.

    If I was to invest effort/time building a road bike and the choice is between 27.5" and 26" why wouldn't I choose 27.5"?

  • Cost vs usability.

    Ignoring the 'road bike' category for the time being, I'm not dismissing 26" simply because it's been around for yonks and parts can be had for peanuts, even in the middle of nowhere. The argument for 27.5 is also much stronger when you go off road. Roll over all the things! For the road, does it really have as dramatic an effect? I very much doubt it in a blind test with someone who's bike is simply transport.
    Building a a bike because you can isn't the same as building a bike you need.

  • When it come to MTB, 650b (or 27.5 really) is now an idea choice for the smaller size of the 29ers, as it's in proportion to the frame size.

  • ...okay, do you have a reason why I shouldn't choose 27.5"?

About

Avatar for Chak @Chak started