You are reading a single comment by @Clockwise and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • I don't get it, cannon law has the same law pretty much word for word. Everyone can dig out an ancient text to do whatever they want.

    http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P52.HTM

    Can. 1369 A person who in a public show or speech, in published writing, or in other uses of the instruments of social communication utters blasphemy, gravely injures good morals, expresses insults, or excites hatred or contempt against religion or the Church is to be punished with a just penalty.

  • Everyone can dig out an ancient text to do whatever they want.

    In general terms you can. If you wanted to invade another country or stone someone to death for some arbitrary crime, you could probably find some religious writing somewhere that allows (or even encourages) it and use it as a pathetic attempt to excuse your violence. But this case is different I think. This wasn't an expression of a general desire to do violence, it was a specific act of revenge against a magazine that had published pictures of Muhammad. How would that desire to inflict revenge for a religious slight exist in the absence of religion?

About

Avatar for Clockwise @Clockwise started