Pilger would have done better to focus on one area of deception / misinformation and expose it in detail, than produce this rambling paranoid rant. He touches on huge complex issues and sums them up in a paragraph, failing, like the journalists he rails against, to cite reliable sources for his claims. What he writes is no more believable than what I read in the Grauniad etc because it is equally partisan and agenda driven.
For example I'm sure what he has to say about the Russia situation is valuable but I'd like to read a fully researched article on that, not just "everything you think you know is lies".
Pilger would have done better to focus on one area of deception / misinformation and expose it in detail, than produce this rambling paranoid rant. He touches on huge complex issues and sums them up in a paragraph, failing, like the journalists he rails against, to cite reliable sources for his claims. What he writes is no more believable than what I read in the Grauniad etc because it is equally partisan and agenda driven.
For example I'm sure what he has to say about the Russia situation is valuable but I'd like to read a fully researched article on that, not just "everything you think you know is lies".