-
multigrooves, vanneau
you can cycle as predictably as you like, be as experienced as you like, wear flashing lights, and still there can be some incompetent driver who drives into you from behind:
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/cycle-death-daughter-may-prosecute-driver-9925170.html
-
Not sure what your point is. Dangerous drivers also kill pedestrians. There are segregated spaces for people walking yet drivers still manage to crash into and kill people on pavements too. It seems absurd to assume segregation into cycling ghettos will ensure drivers won't crash into people on bikes.
As @edscoble points out what is really needed is a change in the law and how these things are prosecuted will change driver attitudes.
This is a sound point. It's here that the most extreme version of the segregation argument tends to tie itself in knots: it's pushing the idea of 'making cycling safer' on the one hand, while refusing any suggestion of actually trying to cycle in a more organised / predictable way, despite this being one way of making cycling a safer activity in general, because then cycling in some way is no longer something 'anyone can do'.