Granted, it was on a forum for fixed gear riders — "vehicular cyclists" — who love riding in traffic, so probably the most hostile place possible to argue my case.
Why did you choose lfgss to argue your case? #clickbaiting
That term Vehicular Cyclists is nonsense and irrelevant. Whether or not there are segregated lanes built people will have to use local roads with no segregation (as they still do in the majority of trips in North Europe). Cycles are vehicles (and capable of speed). The Dutch recognise that which is why they train cyclists to share the road with drivers too.
Post by @cyclelove abut his discussions here yesterday
http://greig.cc/journal/2014/12/cycling-infrastructure-is-not-for-cyclists
Why did you choose lfgss to argue your case? #clickbaiting
That term Vehicular Cyclists is nonsense and irrelevant. Whether or not there are segregated lanes built people will have to use local roads with no segregation (as they still do in the majority of trips in North Europe). Cycles are vehicles (and capable of speed). The Dutch recognise that which is why they train cyclists to share the road with drivers too.