You are reading a single comment by @Vanneau and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
By taking cyclists partly off the road it creates a greater danger from motorists who no longer expect cyclists as a normal component of road use
That doesn't make sense. Proper infrastructure will lead to (a very visible) uptake in cycling. People driving will be MORE expectant of seeing bikes around.
One common argument against segregated infrastructure - particularly infrastructure focused on 'conflict points' - is that by taking cyclists partly off the road it creates a greater danger from motorists who no longer expect cyclists as a normal component of road use. There are other arguments but that's one of the strongest.
For a group against just one part of HCC policy they seem pretty frothily worked up, with all their threats to resign membership as per their webpage.