• I would imagine that in terms of litigation, a driver is probably better funded to defend themselves legally. But like I said, this is just hypothetical, I could be very wrong, just an opinion.

    Edit: I would also suggest that in describing the vehicle, it distinguishes it from car/bus/truck etc, and therefore infers the potential severity of the accident.

  • I would also suggest that in describing the vehicle, it distinguishes it from car/bus/truck etc, and therefore infers the potential severity of the accident

    So saying car/bus/lorry/ driver would address this issue of severity of the incident (saying accident also either presumes no fault or at least no intention which may not be the case)

About

Avatar for skydancer @skydancer started