SSCX Only!

Posted on
Page
of 195
  • Arhhh. This is the internet. I am neither into wars or nazis. Sorry if I offended you.

  • You didn't. I just thought it was worth pointing out it was ... you know ...

  • He's talking about Remembrance Day, which is by coincidence, today, a memorial dedicated to the soldiers of the first World War (and second I think), it's a UK/Commonwealth thing.

  • I ended up with 70mm bb drop, 73.5 head tube, 1010mm axel to axel slammed 40/21T. 1030mm 40/19T in the photos. Quite pleased with the handling. Even with the slight toe overlap.

    That sound pretty good going, 70mm BB drop is pretty low for a CX, what's your advantage behind this?

  • It really isn't, Ed.

  • Alright. Didn't know.

    I wanted low bb as I have only had cx bikes with fairly high bbs. I wanted to get faster handling out of corners as I struggle with this on ss.
    Simply I believe the lower balance point will give me better control. I do not fear pedal strike even though I am on 175 arms and bb height from ground is ca 275mm to center bb.

  • Really? I usually see them around 65mm.

  • Not many off the peg carbon frames at 70-75mm I think. Not many with steep head tubes either. Maybe I am doing it wrong :-) but so far IT handles great and I am super excited for tomorrows cx training.

  • I was wrong. BB drop is 75mm ;-)

    Shitty drawing but you get the idea.

  • Wow, that's nearly as much as my LHT had ( 78mm ).

    Low BBs are fun though :-)

  • A butchered mech should be able to operate as a push-up if the chosen sprocket size would have been acceptable at the equivalent position in a cassette.

    An MTB mech might give you more clearance.

  • So shift the mech in towards the wheel if you need increased space between the cog and jockey wheel?

  • I think it's the other way round.
    Shifting the mech inwards toward the wheel increases the space between cog and jockey.

  • lol, that's what I've written.

  • ...exactly.

  • ...asshole
    ;-)

  • Comprehension fail on my part.
    Much apologies. Many regret. Wow. Asshole.
    ;-)

  • Yes, but that messes with the chainline.

  • This looks fun

    Quoted for new page, because it's fucking rad and looks perilously close to 'the answer'.
    If one were to build this kind of bike and want

    • ability to use a medium-travel sus fork
    • ability to use a 1x10spd geared and SS drivetrain

    what dropout-type would be ideal? Something sliding?
    What would be a good frameset to start with?

  • True. I guess you'd only be able to go so far inwards before that became an issue.

    3/32" 8/9sp chains work fine so it's not essential the chainline is perfect.

  • Yeah never thought of doing that actually, thanks! Going to experiment later this week. Currently doing an SS conversion on my Cube Agree GTC Pro, blasphemy? Probably, but the 105/ultegra stuff is being donated to the better half's bike :)

  • A custom one? ss mtb?

  • Maybe something like the Soma B-Side might fit the bill, but with a longer ST. Slightly less 'dirt-jump' geo.

  • On One Scandal with the swapouts?

    It's intended for 29" wheels.

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

SSCX Only!

Posted by Avatar for nuknow @nuknow

Actions