i guess all we have a big range of confortable cadence (thinking in geared bikes), and allways think that with a little more cadence you can achieve what biopace claims (less stress in knees) and what q-ringns or rotor claims (more power or shorter dead spot).
i think a lot about this oval rings, but still can´t see the real advantage. if someone can illuminate me..
i guess all we have a big range of confortable cadence (thinking in geared bikes), and allways think that with a little more cadence you can achieve what biopace claims (less stress in knees) and what q-ringns or rotor claims (more power or shorter dead spot).
i think a lot about this oval rings, but still can´t see the real advantage. if someone can illuminate me..