-
• #527
I count four. How's my math?
-
• #528
I reckon 4 too. Tough to see properly 'cause the bike isn't properly parallel to zee wall.
-
• #529
Almost a 6 if the pedal was straight, solid score though!
-
• #530
For what? From drops to pedal? Ok, now I'm losing the plot :)
-
• #531
Dos looks pretty decent with the parallax forks.
-
• #532
I dont even get one...
-
• #533
-
• #534
^inversed vertigo
-
• #535
^unusual, interesting stem. when i see these planet xs on the street they feel out of this world
-
• #536
is that the biggest size? he needs bigger....
-
• #537
A comfortable 3...
-
• #538
-
• #539
Genuine 5?
1 Attachment
-
• #540
Nope
-
• #541
small bricks ?
-
• #542
Skewed angle parallaxes shit
-
• #543
brick.org.uk for your brick standards.
-
• #544
Granted it's just for refractory bricks (like the ones used in a kiln)
but ISO 5019-1 lists dimensions for rectangular bricks (although really more like documents the different sizes in use).
-
• #545
extra points for extra brick patterns?
1 Attachment
-
• #546
Have some for amazing paint. It looks surprisingly correct with Force too.
-
• #547
Am I doing it right??
1 Attachment
-
• #548
doing it wrong :)
-
• #549
And it rides even better...
-
• #550
scoblebob
1 Attachment
5 bricks. Cross post from CP.
1 Attachment