You are reading a single comment by @marcom and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
I may have misunderstood as you said "It's so vague to be no use at all".
Not sure on that, as some patterns do emerge which are evidence based.You are right things have to be seen in the light of culture/personal patterns etc. Perhaps the way forward is to teach how we can see how these influence us...then at least we can choose to keep, or choose to reject.
Neurology is more "hard-core" but the big question ATM is if we can correctly picture the "subjective experience". We can extract images by now, have a guess at moods, but as the orchestration of all that makes for the subjective experience we call us...
JWestland
@marcom
I didn't say not evidence at all… We were talking about a 50/50ish… dependant from a long list of factors: the patient, the doctor, his/her lover, the moment, the actual life, the substances, childhood, culture, the weather, money, politicians that you vote, etc etc.
And and the various combinations too.
If we talk about neurology then it's different, even if often not really much can be done anyway.